Improving outcomes in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C
Activity information
Release Date: August 31, 2025 · Expiration Date: August 31, 2026
Activity Overview
This activity prepares healthcare teams to identify, diagnose, and coordinate care for patients with suspected NPC, which is critical for timely referrals and interdisciplinary management. Case-based modules simulate real-world diagnostic challenges, promoting the critical thinking and multidisciplinary collaboration necessary to recognize and manage complex, rare diseases like NPC.
Target Audience
This activity is designed for an audience of Physicians.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of the educational activity, participants should be able to:
• Identify classic and atypical clinical presentations of NPC across age groups
• Differentiate NPC from primary psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders
• Apply a multi-modal diagnostic strategy integrating clinical, biochemical, and molecular data
Criteria for Success
To obtain a certificate of completion, a score of 70% or better on the post-test is required. Please proceed with the activity until you have successfully completed this program, answered all test questions, completed the post-test and evaluation, and have received a digital copy of your certificate. You must participate in the entire activity to receive credit. There is no fee to participate in this activity. If you have questions about this activity, please contact AKH Inc. at ketrea@akhcme.com.
https://akhinc.formstack.com/forms/250175e2
CE credit provided by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare.
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare and Orakle LLC. AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Physicians
AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare designates this enduring for a maximum of .50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Commercial Support
This activity is supported from an independent medical education grant from Zevra Therapeutics.
Disclosures
| Name | Relationship | Commercial Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Walla Al-Hertani, MD, MSc, FRCPC, FCCMG, FACMG (faculty) | Advisor | Agyany Pharma, Amicus Therapeutics, Azafaros, Intrabio, Cyclo Therapeutics, HCU Network America (HCUNA), Kriya Therapeutics, National Niemann-Pick disease Foundation (NNPDF), Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ultragenyx, Zevra Therapeutics |
| Consultant | Beam Therapeutics | |
| Researcher | Denali Therapeutics (Genetics Evaluation), Sanofi - International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) Registry | |
| Tarekegn Hiwot MD, Msc, PhD (faculty) | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN - President | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| Michele Bielarski, RN (planner/reviewer) | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| AKH Inc Staff and Planners | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| Orakle LLC Staff and Planners | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
All of the relevant financial relationships listed for these individuals have been mitigated.
It is the policy of AKH Inc. to ensure independence, balance, objectivity, scientific rigor, and integrity in all of its continuing education activities. The author must disclose to the participants any significant relationships with ineligible companies whose products or devices may be mentioned in the activity or with the commercial supporter of this continuing education activity. Identified conflicts of interest are mitigated by AKH prior to accreditation of the activity. AKH planners and reviewers have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Use and Investigational Product
This educational activity may include discussion of uses of agents that are investigational and/or unapproved by the FDA. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Disclaimer
This course is designed solely to provide the healthcare professional with information to assist in his/her practice and professional development and is not to be considered a diagnostic tool to replace professional advice or treatment. The course serves as a general guide to the healthcare professional, and therefore, cannot be considered as giving legal, nursing, medical, or other professional advice in specific cases. AKH Inc. specifically disclaim responsibility for any adverse consequences resulting directly or indirectly from information in the course, for undetected error, or through participants misunderstanding of the content. If you would like to opt out from future communications from AKH please send an email to optout@akhcme.com with your information with "Opt Out" in the subject line.
Pre-test
Answered before any case content is shown · answers are recorded, feedback follows the post-test.
A short professional profile and one question. Your answers power the outcome analysis for this activity; they are never used to judge you individually.
Pre-test · Question 1 of 1
Which of the following is the most clinically relevant bile acid biomarker for NPC?
Introduction
History of Present Illness
Welcome. Your patient today is Lucy T.
Lucy is a 3-year-old girl brought in by her parents due to developmental regression, clumsiness, and frequent falls. Her parents report that she initially met early milestones but has gradually lost some of her prior abilities over the past 6–9 months. She now struggles with balance, has difficulty walking without support, and has fine motor coordination issues. They describe her as previously active and talkative, but lately she seems more withdrawn and less communicative.
She has had episodes of sudden floppiness, particularly when laughing. They recall that she had prolonged jaundice as a newborn. The focus of concern is her progressive loss of previously acquired motor and communication skills.
Given the combination of neurologic regression and motor dysfunction, you strongly suspect an underlying inherited condition. The parents are increasingly concerned and have seen multiple specialists without a unifying diagnosis. They are requesting further evaluation to understand what is causing their daughter’s decline.
Consultation
Ask the patient — choose a question to play the interview.
Full transcripts below
Transcript · What brings you in today?
Doctor: Hi there—thanks for coming in today. What brings you in?
Lucy’s mother: Thanks for seeing us. We’ve just been really worried. Lucy is 3 now, and over the last 6 to 9 months she’s been changing. She used to walk and talk more clearly, but now she’s falling a lot and seems quieter. Not herself.
Doctor: I’m sorry to hear that. Has she lost skills she had before?
Lucy’s mother: Yes, that’s exactly it. She was meeting milestones as a baby, but she’s regressed. She used to run and play more, now she can barely walk without holding on to something. And when she laughs, she sometimes just collapses—it’s scary.
Doctor: Thank you for sharing all of that. From what you’re describing—the developmental regression and the falls—I have a strong suspicion that this could be a type of inherited condition. We’ll need to run some specialized tests to confirm what’s going on. But you’re absolutely doing the right thing by pushing for answers.
Lucy’s mother: Okay … I just want to know what’s happening to her.
Transcript · Ask about the health of Lucy’s relatives
Doctor: Can you tell me a bit about the health of Lucy’s relatives?
Lucy’s mother: Sure. Well, both my husband and I are healthy. Her older brother, who is 6, is well. We don’t have any known medical conditions, and my husband and I are not related.
Doctor: Okay, and how about other relatives—cousins, grandparents?
Lucy’s mother: That’s a bit harder. We don’t really have much information beyond our immediate families. I mean, no one has mentioned anything like this before—nothing neurological, no childhood illnesses that we know of. But I’ll be honest, we don’t know much about some of the more distant relatives.
Doctor: That’s totally understandable—it’s actually pretty common. The reason I ask is because some of the conditions we’re considering, including certain inherited metabolic disorders, can run in families—even if no one shows clear symptoms.
Lucy’s mother: I see. But would we know if someone else in the family had something like this?
Doctor: Not always. Some carriers don’t have symptoms, and in rare diseases like the one we’re concerned about, it’s possible for it to go unrecognized—especially in extended family. But your answer helps me understand what we’re working with, and it won’t stop us from moving forward with the testing Lucy needs.
Tests
Select appropriate tests for the patient — order and sequence are part of the exercise.
Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Lyso-SM-509
NPC Suspicion Index tool
Oxysterol, plasma (cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol)
Physical examination, including oculomotor testing
Plasma bile acid assay
Whole exome/genome sequencing
Diagnoses
Select the best diagnosis.
Your first answer is recorded before any feedback is shown — commit to the classification you would act on.
Would you like to change your diagnosis?
Your first answer stays on the record either way; a revision is recorded separately.
Existing Diagnoses
| Name | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|
| Schizophrenia | … | Ongoing |
Post-test
The same two questions you answered before the case — now with full feedback. A score of 70% or better is required for the certificate.
Post-test · Question 1 of 1
Which of the following is the most clinically relevant bile acid biomarker for NPC?
Your details
Needed to issue your certificate and send your enduring materials.
Please confirm how we should address you and where to send your certificate and downloadable resources. These details go only to Orakle and AKH for accreditation and delivery — never to the activity's supporter.
All three fields are required — email must be valid
Case Review
Due to its complex and variable presentation, NPC can be challenging to recognize. However, ataxia and progressive motor or developmental regression—alongside a combination of vertical gaze abnormalities—particularly affecting downward movement should raise suspicion for NPC .
Key Clinical Clues
Neurological Findings (Often Progressive)
- VSGP (especially impaired downward saccades)
- Progressive cerebellar ataxia or frequent falls
- Seizures (may be a late feature)
- Gelastic cataplexy (brief loss of muscle tone triggered by laughter)
Psychiatric/Cognitive Symptoms (Typically Adolescent or Adult Onset)
- Psychosis or schizophrenia-like symptoms
- Cognitive decline or dementia (early onset)
- Behavioral disturbances, impulsivity, social withdrawal
Visceral Signs
- Hepatosplenomegaly (especially if unexplained or persistent, organomegaly [especially splenomegaly] is common in adult onset)
- History of prolonged neonatal jaundice or cholestatic hepatitis
- Failure to thrive or feeding difficulties
Biochemical/Other Red Flags
- Elevated plasma oxysterols (eg cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol)
- Abnormal filipin staining in fibroblasts (if tested)
- Positive family history of NPC or similar neurovisceral disorder
Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the cornerstone of management is multidisciplinary supportive care and disease-modifying therapies. Patients should be referred to a center with expertise in LSDs for coordinated follow-up.
In Lucy’s case, early recognition permits timely intervention to preserve function and quality of life. Monitoring should include serial assessments of growth, neurodevelopment, cognition, and behavior, as well as annual audiologic evaluations.
Given her ataxia, development regression, and VSGP, proactive engagement with physical therapy and dietary support is critical. Caregivers should be educated about the likelihood of feeding decline and the potential need for gastrostomy placement. Although disease-modifying therapies such as levacetylleucine and arimoclomol (often with miglustat) offer promising benefits in selected cases, symptomatic and rehabilitative strategies remain the foundation of comprehensive NPC care .
NPC Laboratory Diagnosis Algorithm
Click the diagram to view it full-screen.
Note: in case clinical suspicion was first confirmed by positive biochemical markers, it is still important to identify mutations.
Abbreviations: GD = Gaucher disease; ASM = Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency; EM = Electron microscopy; MLPA = Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; NGS = Next-generation sequencing.
Legend
- ᵃ Elevated cholestane-triol or bile acid derivative and/or lyso-SM-509, with normal or slightly elevated lyso-SM. Cholestane-triol also elevated in acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD), acid lipase deficiency, CTX, certain neonatal cholestasis conditions.
- ᵇ All lyso-SM analogues and bile acid derivatives are elevated in ASMD.
- ᶜ I-cell disease (ML-II and -III) can give a false positive result (very different clinical features).
- ᵈ ASMD can give a similar filipin pattern.
- ᵉ Check allele segregation by parental study or other test.
Introduction
NPC arises from mutations in the NPC1 or NPC2 genes, which disrupt the intracellular handling and trafficking of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and various macromolecules, such as glycosphingolipids. NPC occurs across all ethnic groups, is estimated to have a minimum incidence of 1 in 120 000 live births in Europe, and follows an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern . The condition is linked to 2 distinct genetic loci: NPC1, found on chromosome 18q11–q12, and NPC2 (also known as HE1), located on chromosome 14q24.3 .
Variants in NPC1 are responsible for approximately 95% of diagnosed cases, whereas mutations in NPC2 account for about 4%. A variant historically referred to as Niemann-Pick type D is an allelic form of NPC caused by a specific point mutation in NPC1 .
The NPC1 gene encodes a large membrane-associated glycoprotein that resides mainly in late endosomes and is essential for regulating intracellular LDL-cholesterol transport and distribution . When this pathway is disrupted, cholesterol and other lipids accumulate within cells, particularly neurons, leading to progressive neurodegeneration (Patel SC, et al. 999).
The NPC2 gene produces a small, soluble protein located in lysosomes, historically referred to as a cholesterol-binding protein . Mutations in either NPC1 or NPC2 lead to the accumulation of unesterified cholesterol and glycolipids within late endosomes and lysosomes, resulting in a shared biochemical profile. Both proteins are critically involved in the intracellular movement of cholesterol, sphingosine, and, potentially, other lipids .
General Features by Age of Onset
NPC can manifest at any age, from the perinatal period through late adulthood. In over 85% of cases, systemic involvement—affecting the liver, spleen, or lungs—appears before the onset of neurological symptoms .
Perinatal Onset
Perinatal presentation of NPC often begins with prolonged cholestatic jaundice and liver dysfunction due to hepatic infiltration. Prenatal ultrasound may reveal findings such as hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, or non-immune hydrops fetalis . In some cases, respiratory complications arise from pulmonary involvement, including alveolar proteinosis or a similar syndrome, which can present alongside or independently of liver disease . While jaundice typically resolves within 3 to 4 months after birth, it may persist in some infants, and approximately 10% progress to life-threatening hepatic failure during the neonatal period .
Early Infantile Onset (Age 2 Months to 2 Years)
Early infantile onset of NPC typically occurs between 2 months and 2 years of age. Affected children often have a history of prolonged neonatal jaundice or hepatosplenomegaly before neurological signs emerge. Early neurologic features may include delayed motor development, central hypotonia, tremors, and poor trunk control. As the disease progresses, these children may experience loss of previously acquired motor abilities, cognitive decline, spasticity, and dystonia. VSGP can occur at this stage, although it is often subtle and easily missed .
In some circumstances, an infantile form of NPC can be primarily presented by hypotonia and developmental delay, with minimal or absent liver and lung involvement .
Late Infantile Onset (Age 2 to 6 Years)
Late infantile onset of NPC emerges between the ages of 2 and 6 years. Hepatosplenomegaly is commonly present before neurological symptoms appear, and some children may have experienced cholestatic jaundice during the neonatal period . Early neurological signs often include clumsiness, impaired fine motor coordination, gait disturbances, falls, delayed speech or language development, and VSGP. Additional features may include cerebellar tremor, gelastic cataplexy—with or without narcolepsy—and sensorineural hearing loss. As the disease progresses, affected children may develop increasing ataxia, dystonia, spasticity, cognitive decline, seizures (either focal or generalized), and difficulty swallowing .
Juvenile Onset (Age 6 to 15 Years)
Juvenile onset of NPC typically begins between ages 6 and 15, following normal early development . While hepatosplenomegaly may be observed, it is not consistently present in this age group. Neurologically, children often first exhibit signs of cerebellar dysfunction, such as clumsiness and balance issues that progress to overt ataxia, along with gradual cognitive decline. Difficulties with learning and language loss may emerge over time. VSGP is commonly seen early in the disease course. Gelastic cataplexy—sudden loss of muscle tone triggered by laughter—is reported in up to half of affected individuals and is often accompanied by abnormal sleep studies. As the condition advances, patients may develop progressive dystonia, slurred speech, and swallowing difficulties, and about one-third experience seizures. Most individuals in this group succumb to complications such as aspiration pneumonia between their second and fourth decades of life .
Adult Onset (Age 15 Years and Older)
Adult onset of NPC begins at age 15 or later, and may resemble the juvenile form in terms of symptoms, such as ataxia, VSGP, and cognitive decline, but generally follows a slower clinical course . Some individuals may have a history of unrecognized childhood signs, including splenomegaly or learning difficulties. In many adult cases, the initial presentation includes psychiatric or cognitive symptoms . In fact, psychiatric manifestations are the first noticeable signs in at least one-third of adult-onset patients . Conditions such as depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or early-onset dementia may be the only clinical clues for some time . In others, subtle early features—such as isolated splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, hearing impairment, learning challenges, or impaired vertical gaze—may precede neurological decline that becomes apparent only in adulthood .
Evaluation and Diagnosis
NPC should be considered when clinical features are suggestive, particularly in combination with positive biomarker screening such as elevated oxysterols. The findings most strongly linked to NPC include:
VSGP
Gelastic cataplexy, which is highly specific though not sensitive for NPC
Unexplained isolated splenomegaly, with or without concurrent hepatomegaly
Prolonged neonatal jaundice or cholestasis
Early-onset cognitive decline or dementia, which is common but not unique to NPC.
Additional clinical features that are moderately associated with NPC include:
Ataxia, frequent stumbling, or clumsiness
Slurred speech (dysarthria) and/or difficulty swallowing (dysphagia)
Dystonia, or involuntary muscle contractions causing abnormal postures
Psychotic symptoms, such as delusions or hallucinations.
Confirming a Diagnosis of NPC
Once clinical suspicion is raised, the diagnostic workup should begin with NPC-specific biomarkers or, in cases with strong suspicion, direct genetic testing. Both approaches are appropriate, and gene testing is increasingly used as a first-line tool. If genetic results are inconclusive or do not identify biallelic pathogenic variants, filipin staining in cultured skin fibroblasts can provide diagnostic confirmation .
Biomarker Testing
In individuals with suspected NPC, the first-line biomarker assessment typically involves measuring oxysterols, with cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol being the preferred marker. This assay offers high sensitivity (97–100%) and reasonable specificity (89–100%). An alternative marker—a bile acid derivative of cholestane triol (C-triol; specifically, the glycine-conjugated trihydroxycholanic acid)—may provide even greater specificity . Biomarker testing has largely supplanted skin biopsy with fibroblast culture in the diagnosis of NPC, as it offers faster results and greater sensitivity .
Genetic Testing
Diagnosis of NPC is confirmed when pathogenic variants are identified on both alleles of either the NPC1 or NPC2 genes through gene panel analysis or whole-exome sequencing. Mutations in NPC1, located on chromosome 18q11, account for roughly 95% of cases, while fewer than 5% involve NPC2, found on chromosome 14q24.3 .
Skin Biopsy
When biomarker testing and initial genetic analysis are inconclusive, such as when variants of uncertain significance are identified, a skin biopsy may help confirm the diagnosis of NPC. This involves culturing fibroblasts from a skin sample, exposing them to LDL-derived cholesterol in a lipoprotein-deficient medium, and performing filipin staining. A positive result shows bright, punctate fluorescence near the nucleus, indicating the accumulation of unesterified cholesterol. Cholesterol esterification studies typically reveal impaired processing of LDL-derived cholesterol. While useful in select cases, this method is time-intensive and less sensitive than biomarker assays. Additionally, specialized centers may use electron microscopy to identify polymorphous cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in fibroblasts—findings that are diagnostic when present .
- American College of Physicians. Reference ranges and laboratory values. ACP Internal Medicine Meeting. n.d. [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://annualmeeting.acponline.org/educational-program/reference-ranges Open source ↗
- Berry-Kravis E. Niemann-Pick disease, type C: diagnosis, management and disease-targeted therapies in development. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2021;37:100879. Open source ↗
- Bjurulf B, Spetalen S, Erichsen A, et al. Niemann-Pick disease type C2 presenting as fatal pulmonary alveolar lipoproteinosis: morphological findings in lung and nervous tissue. Med Sci Monit 2008;14:CS71–74. Open source ↗
- Brunetti-Pierri N, Scaglia F. GM1 gangliosidosis: review of clinical, molecular, and therapeutic aspects. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;94(4):391–6. Open source ↗
- Carstea ED, Morris JA, Coleman KG, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis. Science 1997;277:228–31. Open source ↗
- Duffner PK, Barczykowski A, Kay DM, et al. Later onset phenotypes of Krabbe disease: Results of the World-Wide Registry. Pediatr Neurol. 2012;46(5):298–306. Open source ↗
- Ferenci P, Czlonkowska A, Stremmel W, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Wilson’s disease. J Hepatol. 2012;56(3):671–85. Open source ↗
- Geberhiwot T, Moro A, Dardis A, et al. Consensus clinical management guidelines for Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018;13(1):50. Open source ↗
- Gieselmann V, Krägeloh-Mann I. Metachromatic leukodystrophy—an update. Neuropediatrics. 2022;53(1):3–11. Open source ↗
- Imrie J, Wraith JE. Isolated splenomegaly as the presenting feature of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Arch Dis Child 2001;84:427–29. Open source ↗
- Jiang X, Sidhu R, Porter FD, et al. A sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method for rapid diagnosis of Niemann-Pick C1 disease from human plasma. J Lipid Res 2011;52:1435–45. Open source ↗
- Josephs KA, Van Gerpen MW, Van Gerpen JA. Adult onset Niemann-Pick disease type C presenting with psychosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:528–30. Open source ↗
- Kelly DA, Portmann B, Mowat AP, et al. Niemann-Pick disease type C: diagnosis and outcome in children, with particular reference to liver disease. J Pediatr 1993;123:242–47. Open source ↗
- Maegawa GH, Stockley T, Tropak M, Banwell B, Blaser S, Kok F, Giugliani R, Mahuran D, Clarke JT. The natural history of juvenile or subacute GM2 gangliosidosis: 21 new cases and literature review of 134 previously reported. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1550–e1562. Open source ↗
- Manzotti C, Casazza G, Stimac T, et al. Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7(7):CD012546. Open source ↗
- Naureckiene S, Sleat DE, Lackland H, et al. Identification of HE1 as the second gene of Niemann-Pick C disease. Science 2000;290:2298–2301. Open source ↗
- Naureckiene S, Sleat DE, Lackland H, et al. Identification of HE1 as the second gene of Niemann-Pick C disease. Science 2000;290:2298–2301. Open source ↗
- Pajares S, Arias A, García-Villoria J, et al. Cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol: high levels in Niemann-Pick type C, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, and lysosomal acid lipase deficiency. J Lipid Res 2015;56:1926–35. Open source ↗
- Papandreou A, Gissen P. Diagnostic workup and management of patients with suspected Niemann-Pick type C disease. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016;9(3):216–29. Open source ↗
- Park WD, O’Brien JF, Lundquist PA, et al. Identification of 58 novel mutations in Niemann-Pick disease type C: correlation with biochemical phenotype and importance of PTC1-like domains in NPC1. Hum Mutat 2003;22:313–25. Open source ↗
- Patel SC, Suresh S, Kumar U, et al. Localization of Niemann-Pick C1 protein in astrocytes: implications for neuronal degeneration in Niemann-Pick type C disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:1657–62. Open source ↗
- Patterson M. Niemann-Pick disease type C. In: GeneReviews. University of Washington, Seattle. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1296/ (Accessed June 2025). Open source ↗
- Patterson MC, Clayton P, Gissen P, et al. Recommendations for the detection and diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C: An update. Neurol Clin Pract 2017;7:499–511. Open source ↗
- Platt FM. The expanding boundaries of sphingolipid lysosomal storage diseases; insights from Niemann-Pick disease type C. Biochem Soc Trans 2023;51:1777–85. Open source ↗
- Schiffmann R. Niemann-Pick type C disease. In: UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. https://www.uptodate.com (Accessed June 2025). Open source ↗
- Sévin M, Lesca G, Baumann N, et al. The adult form of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Brain 2007;130:120–33. Open source ↗
- Simonati A, Williams RE. Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis: The Multifaceted Approach to the Clinical Issues, an Overview. Front Neurol. 2022;13:811686. Open source ↗
- Spiegel R, Raas-Rothschild A, Reish O, et al. The clinical spectrum of fetal Niemann-Pick type C. Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:446–50. Open source ↗
- Sullivan D, Walterfang M, Velakoulis D. Bipolar disorder and Niemann-Pick disease type C. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:1021–22. Open source ↗
- Vanier MT, Wenger DA, Comly ME, et al. Niemann-Pick disease group C: clinical variability and diagnosis based on defective cholesterol esterification. A collaborative study on 70 patients. Clin Genet 1988;33:331–48. Open source ↗
- Vanier MT. Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010;5:16. Open source ↗
- Vanier MT. Phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity in Niemann-Pick disease type C: current knowledge and practical implications. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1997;109:68 Open source ↗
- Vanier MT. Prenatal diagnosis of Niemann-Pick diseases types A, B and C. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:630–34. Open source ↗
- Wijburg FA, Sedel F, Pineda M, et al. Development of a suspicion index to aid diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Neurology. 2012;78:1560–7. Open source ↗
- Wijburg FA, Sedel F, Pineda M, et al. Development of a suspicion index to aid diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Neurology 2012;78:1560–67. Open source ↗
- Winsor EJ, Welch JP. Genetic and demographic aspects of Nova Scotia Niemann-Pick disease (type D). Am J Hum Genet 1978;30:530–38. Open source ↗
Evaluation
How satisfied were you with this case?
1 · Not at all satisfied10 · Extremely satisfied
How useful did you find this activity in enhancing your knowledge and skills for improving patient care in your clinical practice?
To what extent were the stated learning objectives met as a result of this activity?
Overall, how would you rate the quality and content presented by the experts in this activity?
How confident are you in applying the information from this activity to patient care?
Following this activity, do you plan to seek additional information on this topic?
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about this activity:
SA = Strongly agree · A = Agree · N = Neutral · D = Disagree · SD = Strongly disagree
Based on the information presented in the activity, I will:
Will this case change how you manage these patients?
Please specify how:
May we contact you in 45 days for a brief follow-up survey on how this activity affected your practice?
Your certificate
Claim your credit at AKHImproving outcomes in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C
Learning Objectives — Upon completion of the educational activity, participants should be able to:
• Identify classic and atypical clinical presentations of NPC across age groups
• Differentiate NPC from primary psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders
• Apply a multi-modal diagnostic strategy integrating clinical, biochemical, and molecular data
CE credit provided by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare.
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare and Orakle LLC. AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Physicians — AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare designates this enduring for a maximum of .50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Commercial Support — This activity is supported from an independent medical education grant from Zevra Therapeutics.