Improving outcomes in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C

Activity information

Release Date: August 31, 2025 · Expiration Date: August 31, 2026

Activity Overview
This activity prepares healthcare teams to identify, diagnose, and coordinate care for patients with suspected NPC, which is critical for timely referrals and interdisciplinary management. Case-based modules simulate real-world diagnostic challenges, promoting the critical thinking and multidisciplinary collaboration necessary to recognize and manage complex, rare diseases like NPC.

Target Audience
This activity is designed for an audience of Physicians.

Learning Objectives
Upon completion of the educational activity, participants should be able to:

• Identify classic and atypical clinical presentations of NPC across age groups

• Differentiate NPC from primary psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders

• Apply a multi-modal diagnostic strategy integrating clinical, biochemical, and molecular data

Criteria for Success
To obtain a certificate of completion, a score of 70% or better on the post-test is required. Please proceed with the activity until you have successfully completed this program, answered all test questions, completed the post-test and evaluation, and have received a digital copy of your certificate. You must participate in the entire activity to receive credit. There is no fee to participate in this activity. If you have questions about this activity, please contact AKH Inc. at ketrea@akhcme.com.

https://akhinc.formstack.com/forms/250175e2

CE credit provided by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare.

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare and Orakle LLC. AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Physicians
AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare designates this enduring for a maximum of .50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Commercial Support
This activity is supported from an independent medical education grant from Zevra Therapeutics.

Disclosures

NameRelationshipCommercial Interest
Walla Al-Hertani, MD, MSc, FRCPC, FCCMG, FACMG (faculty)AdvisorAgyany Pharma, Amicus Therapeutics, Azafaros, Intrabio, Cyclo Therapeutics, HCU Network America (HCUNA), Kriya Therapeutics, National Niemann-Pick disease Foundation (NNPDF), Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ultragenyx, Zevra Therapeutics
ConsultantBeam Therapeutics
ResearcherDenali Therapeutics (Genetics Evaluation), Sanofi - International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) Registry
Tarekegn Hiwot MD, Msc, PhD (faculty)N/ANothing to disclose
Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN - PresidentN/ANothing to disclose
Michele Bielarski, RN (planner/reviewer)N/ANothing to disclose
AKH Inc Staff and PlannersN/ANothing to disclose
Orakle LLC Staff and PlannersN/ANothing to disclose

All of the relevant financial relationships listed for these individuals have been mitigated.

It is the policy of AKH Inc. to ensure independence, balance, objectivity, scientific rigor, and integrity in all of its continuing education activities. The author must disclose to the participants any significant relationships with ineligible companies whose products or devices may be mentioned in the activity or with the commercial supporter of this continuing education activity. Identified conflicts of interest are mitigated by AKH prior to accreditation of the activity. AKH planners and reviewers have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Disclosure of Unlabeled Use and Investigational Product
This educational activity may include discussion of uses of agents that are investigational and/or unapproved by the FDA. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

Disclaimer
This course is designed solely to provide the healthcare professional with information to assist in his/her practice and professional development and is not to be considered a diagnostic tool to replace professional advice or treatment. The course serves as a general guide to the healthcare professional, and therefore, cannot be considered as giving legal, nursing, medical, or other professional advice in specific cases. AKH Inc. specifically disclaim responsibility for any adverse consequences resulting directly or indirectly from information in the course, for undetected error, or through participants misunderstanding of the content. If you would like to opt out from future communications from AKH please send an email to optout@akhcme.com with your information with "Opt Out" in the subject line.

Pre-test

Answered before any case content is shown · answers are recorded, feedback follows the post-test.

A short professional profile and two questions. Your answers power the outcome analysis for this activity; they are never used to judge you individually.

Pre-test · Question 1 of 2

A 15-year-old girl is referred to neurology for evaluation of progressive dementia-like symptoms. Over the past year, she has developed worsening memory, poor executive function, emotional dysregulation, and social withdrawal. Formerly a strong student, she now forgets daily tasks and struggles academically. Her gait has become wide-based, and her speech is increasingly slurred. Neurologic exam reveals dysarthria, truncal ataxia, and slowed vertical saccades. Brain MRI shows mild cerebellar atrophy; EEG is normal. Which of the following findings most strongly supports a diagnosis of NPC over a primary psychiatric or mood disorder? Select all that apply.

Select an answer to continue

Pre-test · Question 2 of 2

Which of the following is the most clinically relevant bile acid biomarker for NPC?

Select an answer to continue

Introduction

History of Present Illness

Welcome. Your patient today is George R.

A 34-year-old man presents for evaluation of treatment-resistant psychosis and poor balance. He has a 3-year history of paranoid psychosis. Despite treatment for schizophrenia, he has shown only a partial response, with frequent relapses and notable sensitivity to antipsychotic medications, including side effects at low doses.

Over the past year, he has also developed increasing unsteadiness, particularly noticeable when navigating stairs. His gait has become wide-based and uncoordinated, with occasional missteps and a tendency to veer to one side. He reports several near-falls and a gradual decline in balance but denies motor weakness or sensory loss. His psychiatric team is considering adjusting his medication; however, you wish to re-evaluate his diagnosis given the poor response to three different antipsychotics and your concern for a possible underlying inherited condition.

Family and Social History

There is no history of substance use or family history of neurologic or psychiatric illness, or consanguinity.

Review of Systems

Reports progressive balance difficulties and recent memory decline.

Consultation

Ask the patient — choose a question to play the interview.

Full transcripts below

Transcript · Ask about George's Medical History

Doctor: Hi George, it's good to see you again. I've been reviewing your notes and wanted to spend some time today hearing more from your perspective, especially how things started and changed. Does that sound okay?

George: Sure, I mean … if it helps.

Doctor: Let's start at the beginning. You were first diagnosed with a psychiatric condition in your early 30s?

George: Yeah, around 31. I was struggling—I thought people were watching me, talking about me. I was hearing things, like voices in the walls or the distance. My girlfriend back then said I wasn't making sense, so I ended up seeing a psychiatrist.

Doctor: That must've been a difficult time.

George: It was. They said it was probably schizophrenia, maybe bipolar with psychosis. I've been on meds since then.

Doctor: Did any of those seem to help?

George: Not really. Maybe a little at first, but the voices never fully stopped. The delusions would come and go. I've had … what, 4 or 5 relapses? Each time, they just adjusted the meds. Sometimes I got stiff, like my muscles would lock up. And I started slurring my words.

Doctor: And how have things been recently?

George: About the same, I guess. The symptoms come and go, but no major changes.

Doctor: That sounds frustrating. Thank you for sharing.

Transcript · Ask about George's Childhood

Doctor: George, if that's alright, I'd like to ask some questions about your earlier life. Sometimes childhood medical issues can help us understand the whole picture.

George: Sure, I don't think there was much. I don't really remember anything significant from when I was a kid.

Doctor: And developmentally, did you meet milestones on time? Walking, talking?

George: No, I graduated high school just fine and don't remember needing help.

Doctor: That's helpful, George. Thanks for sharing that. You know, taking everything together—the way your symptoms have progressed over time, the fact you've experienced side effects to the medications even at very low doses—it makes me wonder if there could be a medical condition that's been quietly progressing.

George: Like what?

Doctor: Well, there are some rare inherited conditions, especially ones that affect how the body processes certain substances. These conditions can first appear as psychiatric symptoms and then slowly involve the nervous system. Many of these are autosomal recessive, meaning they can stay hidden until later in life.

George: So … this might not just be schizophrenia?

Doctor: Possibly not. I don't want to jump to conclusions, but I think it's time to look more closely. I'd like to order some specialized blood tests and genetic studies. These can help us determine whether an underlying condition explains what you've been experiencing.

George: Okay. I mean … if it helps figure this out, I'm in.

Doctor: Great. We'll walk you through everything step by step.

Tests

Select appropriate tests for the patient — order and sequence are part of the exercise.

Bile acid derivative (eg 3β,5α,6β-trihydroxy-cholanoyl-glycine)

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Genetic testing (Ataxia panel)

Lyso-SM-509

NPC Suspicion Index tool

Oxysterol, plasma (cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol)

Physical examination

Diagnoses

Select the best diagnosis.

Your first answer is recorded before any feedback is shown — commit to the classification you would act on.

NameAction
Select a diagnosis to continue

Post-test

The same two questions you answered before the case — now with full feedback. A score of 70% or better is required for the certificate.

Post-test · Question 1 of 2

A 15-year-old girl is referred to neurology for evaluation of progressive dementia-like symptoms. Over the past year, she has developed worsening memory, poor executive function, emotional dysregulation, and social withdrawal. Formerly a strong student, she now forgets daily tasks and struggles academically. Her gait has become wide-based, and her speech is increasingly slurred. Neurologic exam reveals dysarthria, truncal ataxia, and slowed vertical saccades. Brain MRI shows mild cerebellar atrophy; EEG is normal. Which of the following findings most strongly supports a diagnosis of NPC over a primary psychiatric or mood disorder? Select all that apply.

Select an answer to continue

Post-test · Question 2 of 2

Which of the following is the most clinically relevant bile acid biomarker for NPC?

Select an answer to continue

Your details

Needed to issue your certificate and send your enduring materials.

Please confirm how we should address you and where to send your certificate and downloadable resources. These details go only to Orakle and AKH for accreditation and delivery — never to the activity's supporter.

All three fields are required — email must be valid

Case Review

This case highlights the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis when evaluating psychiatric symptoms with atypical features. George R. presented with treatment-resistant psychosis at age 31, followed by a progressive neurological decline marked by gait instability. His poor tolerance to multiple antipsychotics at low doses was overlooked as isolated or unrelated findings.

Over time, the failure of conventional psychiatric treatments and the emergence of subtle neurological signs should have prompted earlier consideration of an underlying neurodegenerative disorder. Ultimately, a targeted workup revealed the patient's NPC Suspicion Index score of 75, elevated oxysterols and lyso-SM-509, and biallelic pathogenic NPC1 mutations, confirming a diagnosis of NPC.

This case highlights the importance of clinicians recognizing the constellation of visceral, psychiatric, and neurologic signs that can evolve over time in NPC. Early suspicion and appropriate testing can reduce diagnostic delays and facilitate access to disease-modifying interventions and supportive care tailored to this rare condition.

Follow-up Planning

After diagnosis, long-term care should be guided by multidisciplinary follow-up, consistent with current guidelines. This includes pharmacological interventions, annual assessments of swallowing function, evaluation of nutritional status, physical therapy for mobility and spasticity, speech and communication support, and neurocognitive monitoring to track disease progression and adapt interventions accordingly .

Overlooked Diagnostic Clues Suggestive of NPC

  • This patient had a progressive psychiatric illness course despite appropriate psychiatric treatment, with multiple relapses and minimal sustained improvement.
  • Adverse reactions to psychotropic medications, including extrapyramidal symptoms at low doses, were attributed to drug sensitivity rather than raising suspicion for an underlying disorder.

Clinical Pearls

  • Cognitive impairment is a hallmark feature of adult-onset NPC and often coexists with neurological manifestations .
  • Patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms combined with one or more of cognitive impairment, neurological symptoms, and visceral symptoms should be screened for NPC .
  • In adults, psychotic and mood-related manifestations are predominant, whereas children exhibit a range of psychiatric features .
  • Patients with undiagnosed NPC may show poor response or intolerance to psychotropic medications, especially antipsychotics .
  • The International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry found that 34% of NPC patients presented with psychiatric symptoms, often alongside cognitive impairment, neurological signs, or visceral involvement .
  • Atypical findings in NPC may include ataxia, splenomegaly, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy (VSGP), dysarthria, dysphagia, early-onset dementia, treatment-resistant psychiatric symptoms (especially in young adults), gelastic cataplexy, dystonia, and refractory epilepsy .

Evaluation

How satisfied were you with this case?

1 · Not at all satisfied10 · Extremely satisfied

How useful did you find this activity in enhancing your knowledge and skills for improving patient care in your clinical practice?

To what extent were the stated learning objectives met as a result of this activity?

Overall, how would you rate the quality and content presented by the experts in this activity?

How confident are you in applying the information from this activity to patient care?

Following this activity, do you plan to seek additional information on this topic?

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about this activity:

SA = Strongly agree · A = Agree · N = Neutral · D = Disagree · SD = Strongly disagree

The content presented was relevant to my clinical practice.
The activity provided practical information that I can apply in my clinical practice.
This activity was free of commercial bias.
The content provided a fair and balanced coverage of the topic.
The learning activities were effective and incorporated active learning methods.
The educational materials were effective.
My educational needs were met by this activity.

Based on the information presented in the activity, I will:

Will this case change how you manage these patients?

May we contact you in 45 days for a brief follow-up survey on how this activity affected your practice?

Answer every evaluation item above to finish

Improving outcomes in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C

Learning Objectives — Upon completion of the educational activity, participants should be able to:

• Identify classic and atypical clinical presentations of NPC across age groups

• Differentiate NPC from primary psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders

• Apply a multi-modal diagnostic strategy integrating clinical, biochemical, and molecular data

CE credit provided by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare.

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare and Orakle LLC. AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Physicians — AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare designates this enduring for a maximum of .50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Commercial Support — This activity is supported from an independent medical education grant from Zevra Therapeutics.

WelcomePre-testIntroductionConsultationTestsDiagnosesPost-testDetailsSummary