Improving outcomes in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C
Activity information
Release Date: August 31, 2025 · Expiration Date: August 31, 2026
Activity Overview
This activity prepares healthcare teams to identify, diagnose, and coordinate care for patients with suspected NPC, which is critical for timely referrals and interdisciplinary management. Case-based modules simulate real-world diagnostic challenges, promoting the critical thinking and multidisciplinary collaboration necessary to recognize and manage complex, rare diseases like NPC.
Target Audience
This activity is designed for an audience of Physicians.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of the educational activity, participants should be able to:
• Identify classic and atypical clinical presentations of NPC across age groups
• Differentiate NPC from primary psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders
• Apply a multi-modal diagnostic strategy integrating clinical, biochemical, and molecular data
Criteria for Success
To obtain a certificate of completion, a score of 70% or better on the post-test is required. Please proceed with the activity until you have successfully completed this program, answered all test questions, completed the post-test and evaluation, and have received a digital copy of your certificate. You must participate in the entire activity to receive credit. There is no fee to participate in this activity. If you have questions about this activity, please contact AKH Inc. at ketrea@akhcme.com.
https://akhinc.formstack.com/forms/250175e2
CE credit provided by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare.
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare and Orakle LLC. AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Physicians
AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare designates this enduring for a maximum of .50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Commercial Support
This activity is supported from an independent medical education grant from Zevra Therapeutics.
Disclosures
| Name | Relationship | Commercial Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Walla Al-Hertani, MD, MSc, FRCPC, FCCMG, FACMG (faculty) | Advisor | Agyany Pharma, Amicus Therapeutics, Azafaros, Intrabio, Cyclo Therapeutics, HCU Network America (HCUNA), Kriya Therapeutics, National Niemann-Pick disease Foundation (NNPDF), Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ultragenyx, Zevra Therapeutics |
| Consultant | Beam Therapeutics | |
| Researcher | Denali Therapeutics (Genetics Evaluation), Sanofi - International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) Registry | |
| Tarekegn Hiwot MD, Msc, PhD (faculty) | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN - President | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| Michele Bielarski, RN (planner/reviewer) | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| AKH Inc Staff and Planners | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
| Orakle LLC Staff and Planners | N/A | Nothing to disclose |
All of the relevant financial relationships listed for these individuals have been mitigated.
It is the policy of AKH Inc. to ensure independence, balance, objectivity, scientific rigor, and integrity in all of its continuing education activities. The author must disclose to the participants any significant relationships with ineligible companies whose products or devices may be mentioned in the activity or with the commercial supporter of this continuing education activity. Identified conflicts of interest are mitigated by AKH prior to accreditation of the activity. AKH planners and reviewers have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Use and Investigational Product
This educational activity may include discussion of uses of agents that are investigational and/or unapproved by the FDA. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Disclaimer
This course is designed solely to provide the healthcare professional with information to assist in his/her practice and professional development and is not to be considered a diagnostic tool to replace professional advice or treatment. The course serves as a general guide to the healthcare professional, and therefore, cannot be considered as giving legal, nursing, medical, or other professional advice in specific cases. AKH Inc. specifically disclaim responsibility for any adverse consequences resulting directly or indirectly from information in the course, for undetected error, or through participants misunderstanding of the content. If you would like to opt out from future communications from AKH please send an email to optout@akhcme.com with your information with "Opt Out" in the subject line.
Pre-test
Answered before any case content is shown · answers are recorded, feedback follows the post-test.
A short professional profile and two questions. Your answers power the outcome analysis for this activity; they are never used to judge you individually.
Pre-test · Question 1 of 2
A 15-year-old girl is referred to neurology for evaluation of progressive dementia-like symptoms. Over the past year, she has developed worsening memory, poor executive function, emotional dysregulation, and social withdrawal. Formerly a strong student, she now forgets daily tasks and struggles academically. Her gait has become wide-based, and her speech is increasingly slurred. Neurologic exam reveals dysarthria, truncal ataxia, and slowed vertical saccades. Brain MRI shows mild cerebellar atrophy; EEG is normal. Which of the following findings most strongly supports a diagnosis of NPC over a primary psychiatric or mood disorder? Select all that apply.
Pre-test · Question 2 of 2
Which of the following is the most clinically relevant bile acid biomarker for NPC?
Introduction
History of Present Illness
Welcome. Your patient today is George R.
A 34-year-old man presents for evaluation of treatment-resistant psychosis and poor balance. He has a 3-year history of paranoid psychosis. Despite treatment for schizophrenia, he has shown only a partial response, with frequent relapses and notable sensitivity to antipsychotic medications, including side effects at low doses.
Over the past year, he has also developed increasing unsteadiness, particularly noticeable when navigating stairs. His gait has become wide-based and uncoordinated, with occasional missteps and a tendency to veer to one side. He reports several near-falls and a gradual decline in balance but denies motor weakness or sensory loss. His psychiatric team is considering adjusting his medication; however, you wish to re-evaluate his diagnosis given the poor response to three different antipsychotics and your concern for a possible underlying inherited condition.
Family and Social History
There is no history of substance use or family history of neurologic or psychiatric illness, or consanguinity.
Review of Systems
Reports progressive balance difficulties and recent memory decline.
Consultation
Ask the patient — choose a question to play the interview.
Full transcripts below
Transcript · Ask about George's Medical History
Doctor: Hi George, it's good to see you again. I've been reviewing your notes and wanted to spend some time today hearing more from your perspective, especially how things started and changed. Does that sound okay?
George: Sure, I mean … if it helps.
Doctor: Let's start at the beginning. You were first diagnosed with a psychiatric condition in your early 30s?
George: Yeah, around 31. I was struggling—I thought people were watching me, talking about me. I was hearing things, like voices in the walls or the distance. My girlfriend back then said I wasn't making sense, so I ended up seeing a psychiatrist.
Doctor: That must've been a difficult time.
George: It was. They said it was probably schizophrenia, maybe bipolar with psychosis. I've been on meds since then.
Doctor: Did any of those seem to help?
George: Not really. Maybe a little at first, but the voices never fully stopped. The delusions would come and go. I've had … what, 4 or 5 relapses? Each time, they just adjusted the meds. Sometimes I got stiff, like my muscles would lock up. And I started slurring my words.
Doctor: And how have things been recently?
George: About the same, I guess. The symptoms come and go, but no major changes.
Doctor: That sounds frustrating. Thank you for sharing.
Transcript · Ask about George's Childhood
Doctor: George, if that's alright, I'd like to ask some questions about your earlier life. Sometimes childhood medical issues can help us understand the whole picture.
George: Sure, I don't think there was much. I don't really remember anything significant from when I was a kid.
Doctor: And developmentally, did you meet milestones on time? Walking, talking?
George: No, I graduated high school just fine and don't remember needing help.
Doctor: That's helpful, George. Thanks for sharing that. You know, taking everything together—the way your symptoms have progressed over time, the fact you've experienced side effects to the medications even at very low doses—it makes me wonder if there could be a medical condition that's been quietly progressing.
George: Like what?
Doctor: Well, there are some rare inherited conditions, especially ones that affect how the body processes certain substances. These conditions can first appear as psychiatric symptoms and then slowly involve the nervous system. Many of these are autosomal recessive, meaning they can stay hidden until later in life.
George: So … this might not just be schizophrenia?
Doctor: Possibly not. I don't want to jump to conclusions, but I think it's time to look more closely. I'd like to order some specialized blood tests and genetic studies. These can help us determine whether an underlying condition explains what you've been experiencing.
George: Okay. I mean … if it helps figure this out, I'm in.
Doctor: Great. We'll walk you through everything step by step.
Tests
Select appropriate tests for the patient — order and sequence are part of the exercise.
Bile acid derivative (eg 3β,5α,6β-trihydroxy-cholanoyl-glycine)
Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Genetic testing (Ataxia panel)
Lyso-SM-509
NPC Suspicion Index tool
Oxysterol, plasma (cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol)
Physical examination
Diagnoses
Select the best diagnosis.
Your first answer is recorded before any feedback is shown — commit to the classification you would act on.
Would you like to change your diagnosis?
Your first answer stays on the record either way; a revision is recorded separately.
Existing Diagnoses
| Name | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|
| Schizophrenia | … | Ongoing |
Post-test
The same two questions you answered before the case — now with full feedback. A score of 70% or better is required for the certificate.
Post-test · Question 1 of 2
A 15-year-old girl is referred to neurology for evaluation of progressive dementia-like symptoms. Over the past year, she has developed worsening memory, poor executive function, emotional dysregulation, and social withdrawal. Formerly a strong student, she now forgets daily tasks and struggles academically. Her gait has become wide-based, and her speech is increasingly slurred. Neurologic exam reveals dysarthria, truncal ataxia, and slowed vertical saccades. Brain MRI shows mild cerebellar atrophy; EEG is normal. Which of the following findings most strongly supports a diagnosis of NPC over a primary psychiatric or mood disorder? Select all that apply.
Post-test · Question 2 of 2
Which of the following is the most clinically relevant bile acid biomarker for NPC?
Your details
Needed to issue your certificate and send your enduring materials.
Please confirm how we should address you and where to send your certificate and downloadable resources. These details go only to Orakle and AKH for accreditation and delivery — never to the activity's supporter.
All three fields are required — email must be valid
Case Review
This case highlights the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis when evaluating psychiatric symptoms with atypical features. George R. presented with treatment-resistant psychosis at age 31, followed by a progressive neurological decline marked by gait instability. His poor tolerance to multiple antipsychotics at low doses was overlooked as isolated or unrelated findings.
Over time, the failure of conventional psychiatric treatments and the emergence of subtle neurological signs should have prompted earlier consideration of an underlying neurodegenerative disorder. Ultimately, a targeted workup revealed the patient's NPC Suspicion Index score of 75, elevated oxysterols and lyso-SM-509, and biallelic pathogenic NPC1 mutations, confirming a diagnosis of NPC.
This case highlights the importance of clinicians recognizing the constellation of visceral, psychiatric, and neurologic signs that can evolve over time in NPC. Early suspicion and appropriate testing can reduce diagnostic delays and facilitate access to disease-modifying interventions and supportive care tailored to this rare condition.
Follow-up Planning
After diagnosis, long-term care should be guided by multidisciplinary follow-up, consistent with current guidelines. This includes pharmacological interventions, annual assessments of swallowing function, evaluation of nutritional status, physical therapy for mobility and spasticity, speech and communication support, and neurocognitive monitoring to track disease progression and adapt interventions accordingly .
Overlooked Diagnostic Clues Suggestive of NPC
- This patient had a progressive psychiatric illness course despite appropriate psychiatric treatment, with multiple relapses and minimal sustained improvement.
- Adverse reactions to psychotropic medications, including extrapyramidal symptoms at low doses, were attributed to drug sensitivity rather than raising suspicion for an underlying disorder.
Clinical Pearls
- Cognitive impairment is a hallmark feature of adult-onset NPC and often coexists with neurological manifestations .
- Patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms combined with one or more of cognitive impairment, neurological symptoms, and visceral symptoms should be screened for NPC .
- In adults, psychotic and mood-related manifestations are predominant, whereas children exhibit a range of psychiatric features .
- Patients with undiagnosed NPC may show poor response or intolerance to psychotropic medications, especially antipsychotics .
- The International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry found that 34% of NPC patients presented with psychiatric symptoms, often alongside cognitive impairment, neurological signs, or visceral involvement .
- Atypical findings in NPC may include ataxia, splenomegaly, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy (VSGP), dysarthria, dysphagia, early-onset dementia, treatment-resistant psychiatric symptoms (especially in young adults), gelastic cataplexy, dystonia, and refractory epilepsy .
Overview
Niemann-Pick disease is an autosomal recessive disorder requiring mutations in both gene copies. Types A and B result from mutations in the SMPD1 gene, with over 180 variants identified. NPC is caused by mutations in the NPC1 (chromosome 18) or NPC2 (chromosome 14) genes, leading to defective lipid transport and intracellular accumulation . NPC can present at any age and is frequently underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed .
The prevalence of NPC is estimated at approximately 1 in 150 000, increasing to 1 in 100 000 when including prenatal cases that did not result in live births. Early-life prevalence is likely underestimated due to nonspecific clinical presentations, and overall prevalence may exceed incidence estimates given the prolonged survival seen in later-onset forms of the disease .
NPC largely depends on age at onset. Infantile-onset cases typically have poor survival beyond age 5, while individuals with later onset may live into their 20s. However, prognosis varies by patient based on disease severity and clinical presentation. Older adolescents and young adults may initially present with early-onset dementia or psychiatric symptoms. However, a thorough evaluation often reveals neurologic features of NPC. .
NPC is classified into type C1 and type C2, depending on whether mutations occur in the NPC1 or NPC2 genes. NPC1 mutations account for approximately 95% of cases, with over 30 different pathogenic variants identified. The NPC1 and NPC2 proteins are located in late endosomes and lysosomes, where they play key roles in cholesterol and sterol transport. Loss of function in either protein impairs cholesterol egress from lysosomes, leading to pathological accumulation of unesterified cholesterol within cells. This lysosomal cholesterol build-up is toxic and ultimately results in progressive cellular dysfunction and multisystem organ damage .
Neonatal and Infantile Presentations
In early life, NPC often presents as nonspecific signs that even experienced clinicians may miss. Some infants are identified prenatally due to fetal ascites and go on to develop severe neonatal liver disease, sometimes accompanied by pulmonary involvement due to foam cell infiltration. Many affected infants do not survive this stage; those who do may either exhibit ongoing hypotonia and developmental delay or recover temporarily and present with neurologic symptoms years later. Hepatosplenomegaly is common in infants with hepatic disease but may resolve over time, making organomegaly an unreliable diagnostic marker—its absence does not exclude NPC. Some children present primarily with hypotonia and developmental delay without initial liver or lung disease and may later develop VSGP and signs of progressive neurologic decline .
Pediatric Presentations
The classic onset of NPC typically occurs in mid-to-late childhood, beginning with clumsiness and gait disturbances that evolve into ataxia. Affected children often show early impairment in vertical gaze, with VSGP emerging as slowed or delayed vertical saccades, eventually progressing to horizontal gaze abnormalities in later stages. These physical symptoms are accompanied by subtle cognitive decline, initially mistaken for learning or behavioral issues, but eventually revealing global cognitive deterioration. Many children develop progressive dystonia, starting in one limb and spreading, along with worsening speech (dysarthria and dysphonia) and swallowing difficulties. Seizures—partial or generalized—occur in about one-third of patients, sometimes refractory to treatment, though they may lessen over time. Around 20% experience gelastic cataplexy, triggered by laughter and potentially causing injury due to sudden muscle tone loss. Rare features may include peripheral neuropathy and disrupted sleep linked to hypocretin deficiency, suggesting hypothalamic involvement .
Adolescent and Adult Presentations
In adolescents and adults, NPC may present with neurologic features similar to those seen in childhood, but with a slower progression. Some individuals have survived for decades after symptom onset. In this age group, initial presentation may resemble primary psychiatric illness, such as major depression, schizophrenia, or even bipolar disorder, often delaying diagnosis. While psychiatric symptoms may dominate early clinical impressions, careful neurologic examination typically reveals subtle signs of underlying neurodegeneration .
Suggestive Findings
NPC should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical findings .
Early infantile (<2 years): fetal ascites or neonatal liver disease; prolonged jaundice and/or pulmonary infiltrates.
Late infantile (2 to <6 years): hypotonia and developmental delay; progressive clumsiness evolving into ataxia; vertical supranuclear saccadic palsy (VSGP).
Juvenile (6 to <15 years): initial clumsiness progressing to ataxia; academic difficulties (often misdiagnosed as ADHD); progressive cognitive decline and regression; VSGP is typically present before other neurologic signs; possible seizures, gelastic cataplexy, dystonia, and/or spasticity.
Adolescent/adult (>15 years): cognitive impairment or early-onset dementia; psychiatric symptoms (eg, treatment-resistant depression, psychosis, bipolar-like illness); full range of neurologic signs may eventually emerge.
Other presentations: isolated splenomegaly in childhood, with delayed neurologic symptoms; rare cases: splenomegaly without neurologic involvement in adulthood.
Atypical features (any age): ataxia, splenomegaly, VSGP, dysarthria, dysphagia; early-onset dementia; treatment-resistant psychiatric illness in young adults; gelastic cataplexy, dystonia, epilepsy (especially if refractory).
Diagnosis of NPC
Definitive diagnosis is made by identifying biallelic pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in either NPC1 or NPC2 through molecular genetic testing.
“Likely pathogenic” and “pathogenic” are both considered diagnostic and valid for clinical decision-making. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) do not confirm or rule out the diagnosis .
Establishing the Diagnosis of NPC when NPC is Initially Suspected
Diagnosis is confirmed by identifying biallelic pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in NPC1 or NPC2 using molecular genetic testing .
The preferred approach is gene-targeted testing using a multigene panel that includes: NPC1 and NPC2, other relevant genes associated with: lysosomal storage disorders, treatable neurometabolic conditions, mendelian psychiatric syndromes, metabolic causes of nonimmune hydrops fetalis.
Testing methods may include: sequence analysis; deletion/duplication analysis; custom phenotype-driven panels or targeted exome analysis.
Notes: a diagnosis cannot be confirmed if only one pathogenic variant and one VUS are found. Some laboratories offer flexible, customizable panels based on clinical input. Chromosomal microarray may detect large-scale deletions/duplications not picked up by sequencing.
Establishing the Diagnosis of NPC when NPC is not Initially Suspected
If NPC is not considered at the outset, diagnosis is typically made via comprehensive genomic testing: exome sequencing (most commonly used); genome sequencing (alternative option).
This approach does not require prior selection of candidate genes and is ideal when: the clinical presentation is nonspecific or atypical; there is diagnostic uncertainty despite extensive evaluation.
- American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM). Laboratory test reference ranges – January 2025. ABIM. 2025. Available from: https://www.abim.org/Media/bfijryql/laboratory-reference-ranges.pdf Open source ↗
- American College of Physicians. Reference ranges and laboratory values. ACP Internal Medicine Meeting. n.d. [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://annualmeeting.acponline.org/educational-program/reference-ranges Open source ↗
- Bajwa H, Azhar W. Niemann-Pick disease. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023 Mar 6 [updated]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556129/ Open source ↗
- Berry-Kravis E. Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C: Diagnosis, Management and Disease-Targeted Therapies in Development. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2021 Apr;37:100879. Open source ↗
- Bonnot O, Gama CS, Mengel E, et al. Psychiatric and neurological symptoms in patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC): Findings from the International NPC Registry. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2017;20(4):310–19. Open source ↗
- Cariati I, Masuelli L, Bei R, et al. Neurodegeneration in Niemann-Pick Type C Disease: An updated review on pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to counteract brain and cognitive impairment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(12):6600. Open source ↗
- Chen KJ, Jin RM, Shi CC, et al. The prognostic value of Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 and Niemann-Pick disease type C2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer. 2018;9(3):556–63. Open source ↗
- Federico A, Gallus GN. Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis. 2003 Jul 16 [Updated 2024 Nov 14]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1409/ Open source ↗
- Geberhiwot T, Moro A, Dardis A, Ramaswami U, Sirrs S, Marfa MP, Vanier MT, Walterfang M, Bolton S, Dawson C, Héron B, Stampfer M, Imrie J, Hendriksz C, Gissen P, Crushell E, Coll MJ, Nadjar Y, Klünemann H, Mengel E, Hrebicek M, Jones SA, Ory D, Bembi B, Patterson M; International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry (INPDR). Consensus clinical management guidelines for Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Apr 6;13(1):50. Open source ↗
- Hermann W. Classification and differential diagnosis of Wilson's disease. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S63. Open source ↗
- Imrie J, Vijayaraghaven S, Whitehouse C, et al. Niemann-Pick disease type C in adults. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2002;25:491–500. Open source ↗
- Jiang X, Ory DS. Advancing diagnosis and treatment of Niemann-Pick C disease through biomarker discovery. Exploration of Neuroprotective Therapy. 2021;1:146–158. Open source ↗
- Mengel E, Klünemann HH, Lourenço CM, et al. Niemann-Pick disease type C symptomatology: An expert-based clinical description. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:166. Open source ↗
- Parikh S, Goldstein A, Koenig MK, et al. (2015). Diagnosis and management of mitochondrial disease: a consensus statement from the Mitochondrial Medicine Society. Genetics in Medicine, 17(9), 689–701. Open source ↗
- Patterson M. Niemann-Pick disease type C. 2000 Jan 26 [updated 2020 Dec 10]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1296/ Open source ↗
- Patterson MC, Clayton P, Gissen P, et al. Recommendations for the detection and diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C: an update. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017;7:499–511. Open source ↗
- Regier DS, Tifft CJ, Rothermel CE. GLB1-Related Disorders. 2013 Oct 17 [Updated 2021 Apr 22]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK164500/ Open source ↗
- Rego T, Farrand S, Goh AMY, Eratne D, Kelso W, Mangelsdorf S, Velakoulis D, Walterfang M. Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with Niemann-Pick Type C Disease: Neurobiology and Management. CNS Drugs. 2019 Feb;33(2):125-142. Open source ↗
- Reunert J, Lotz-Havla AS, Polo G, et al. Niemann-Pick Type C-2 Disease: Identification by Analysis of Plasma Cholestane-3β,5α,6β-Triol and Further Insight into the Clinical Phenotype. JIMD Reports. 2015;23:17–26. Open source ↗
- Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24. Open source ↗
- Salsano E, Umeh C, Rufa A, et al. Vertical supranuclear gaze palsy in Niemann-Pick Type C disease. Neurol Sci. 2012;33(6):1225–32. Open source ↗
- Schiffmann R. Niemann-Pick type C disease. In: UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. https://www.uptodate.com (Accessed June 2025) Open source ↗
- Vanier MT. Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:16. Open source ↗
- Wijburg FA, Sedel F, Pineda M, et al. Development of a suspicion index to aid diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Neurology. 2012;78:1560–7. Open source ↗
- Williams CT, De Jesus O. Friedreich Ataxia. [Updated 2023 Aug 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563199/ Open source ↗
- Xu Y, Zhang Q, Tan L, Xie X, Zhao Y. The characteristics and biological significance of NPC2: Mutation and disease. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;782:108284. Open source ↗
Evaluation
How satisfied were you with this case?
1 · Not at all satisfied10 · Extremely satisfied
How useful did you find this activity in enhancing your knowledge and skills for improving patient care in your clinical practice?
To what extent were the stated learning objectives met as a result of this activity?
Overall, how would you rate the quality and content presented by the experts in this activity?
How confident are you in applying the information from this activity to patient care?
Following this activity, do you plan to seek additional information on this topic?
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about this activity:
SA = Strongly agree · A = Agree · N = Neutral · D = Disagree · SD = Strongly disagree
Based on the information presented in the activity, I will:
Will this case change how you manage these patients?
Please specify how:
May we contact you in 45 days for a brief follow-up survey on how this activity affected your practice?
Your certificate
Claim your credit at AKHImproving outcomes in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C
Learning Objectives — Upon completion of the educational activity, participants should be able to:
• Identify classic and atypical clinical presentations of NPC across age groups
• Differentiate NPC from primary psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders
• Apply a multi-modal diagnostic strategy integrating clinical, biochemical, and molecular data
CE credit provided by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare.
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare and Orakle LLC. AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Physicians — AKH Inc., Advancing Knowledge in Healthcare designates this enduring for a maximum of .50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Commercial Support — This activity is supported from an independent medical education grant from Zevra Therapeutics.